ElectionsSettled · October 7, 2026Mon, Oct 5, 3:59 AM UTC

Brazil Presidential Election First Round: Margin of

By Corbin V King · Updated October 7, 2026

This market has settled. Its final read (October 7, 2026) was a 50% implied probability for Lula da Silva <5% on Polymarket, with $1.2M in venue-reported volume.

Final implied probability

Market favorite

Lula da Silva <5% — market favorite

Polymarket · $1.2M reported volume

50%

Implied

84W.E.T. Score

The slate at this observation

Ceremony

Brazil Presidential Election First Round

12 categories priced

Still contested

3

inside 15 points

Tightest

+0

Flávio

Fláviosettled

Contested
  • 42-45%36%
  • 39-42%36%
  • 45-48%14%
  • <39%10%
  • 51%+5%
  • 48-51%3%

+0 pt margin · 6 nominees

Lula Votesettled

Contested
  • 41-44%41%
  • 44%+40%
  • 38-41%19%
  • 35-38%6%
  • <35%3%

+1 pt margin · 5 nominees

Renan Santossettled

Contested
  • 2-4%34%
  • 4-6%24%
  • <2%14%
  • 6-8%14%
  • 8%+11%

+10 pt margin · 5 nominees

Margin ofsettled

Clear favourite
  • Lula da Silva <5%50%
  • Flávio Bolsonaro <5%35%
  • Lula da Silva 5-10%11%
  • Flávio Bolsonaro 5-10%4%
  • Renan Santos Victory1%
  • Lula da Silva 10-15%1%

+15 pt margin · 11 nominees · 5 more

2nd Placesettled

Clear favourite
  • Flávio Bolsonaro61%
  • Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva38%
  • Renan Santos1%
  • Fernando Haddad1%
  • Ratinho Júnior1%
  • Ronaldo Caiado1%

+23 pt margin · 18 nominees · 12 more

Augusto Curysettled

Clear favourite
  • 4-6%50%
  • 6%+20%
  • 2-4%14%
  • 1-2%14%
  • <1%4%

+30 pt margin · 5 nominees

3rd Placesettled

Clear favourite
  • Renan Santos57%
  • Augusto Cury25%
  • Ronaldo Caiado20%
  • Flávio Bolsonaro1%
  • Romeu Zema1%
  • Ratinho Júnior1%

+32 pt margin · 19 nominees · 13 more

1st Place insettled

Clear favourite
  • Lula67%
  • Flavio Bolsonaro28%
  • Renan Santos1%
  • Clariana Barao1%
  • Veterinário Wilson Grassi1%
  • Rui Costa Pimenta1%

+39 pt margin · 13 nominees · 7 more

Fláviosettled

Decided
  • 39%+87%
  • 36-39%10%
  • 33-36%3%
  • <30%2%
  • 30-33%1%

+77 pt margin · 5 nominees

1st Place insettled

Decided
  • Flavio Bolsonaro91%
  • Lula10%
  • Ronaldo Caiado1%
  • Edmilson Costa1%
  • Clariana Barao1%
  • Samara1%

+81 pt margin · 13 nominees · 7 more

1st Place insettled

Decided
  • Flavio Bolsonaro94%
  • Lula3%
  • Zema1%
  • Pablo Marçal1%
  • Clariana Barao1%
  • Samara1%

+91 pt margin · 13 nominees · 7 more

1st Place insettled

Decided
  • Flavio Bolsonaro99%
  • Ronaldo Caiado2%
  • Lula1%
  • Pablo Marçal1%
  • Renan Santos1%
  • Veterinário Wilson Grassi1%

+97 pt margin · 13 nominees · 7 more

Categories represented in this snapshot, tightest observed race first. The lower bar is the runner-up; the gap between them is the recorded margin.

Final odds — settled market snapshotsettled October 7, 2026

OutcomeVenueImplied

Lula da Silva <5%

Polymarket50%

Flávio Bolsonaro <5%

Polymarket35%

Lula da Silva 5-10%

Polymarket11%

Flávio Bolsonaro 5-10%

Polymarket4%

Renan Santos Victory

Polymarket1%

Lula da Silva 10-15%

Polymarket1%

Flávio Bolsonaro 10%+

Polymarket1%

Lula da Silva 15%+

Polymarket1%

Other

Polymarket1%

Tarcisio de Freitas Victory

Polymarket1%

Ratinho Júnior Victory

Polymarket1%

Implied probability = the market’s YES price read as a percentage. This market has settled — these are the final tracked figures, frozen as a historical archive.

Evidencestored reads, labeled by measure

Evidence

Evidence pending— stored reads in flight; the market above is already complete.

W.E.T. Score

How much signal is behind this number?

The W.E.T. Score grades the evidence, not the outcome. Five inputs — comparable volume evidence, news corroboration, cross-venue verification, market coverage, and track-record depth — scored against how much verifiable signal sits behind the headline probability.

Scored from the final settled snapshot · 84/100 · Strong Signal

84Strong Signal
Deep liquidity$1.2M in comparable USD-reported volume. News-backed2 citable headlines corroborate market attention — listed under Citable signals with sources.
ComponentPointsWhat the data says
Liquidity30/30$1.2M in comparable USD-reported volume. Log-scaled: $1k scores 0, while $1M+ maxes the component.
News corroboration16/202 live wire headlines lexically matched to this event — real, citable corroboration that the story is moving.
Cross-venue verification8/20No canonical exact-match pair is available for this snapshot. Related listings are not compared, so this component remains at the documented neutral 8/20.
Market coverage15/1511 tracked markets on this event — more side markets and strikes mean more angles pricing the same story.
Track-record depth15/1510 attributable days tied to one venue, favorite, and listing key. Legacy unkeyed points earn no depth credit.

Citable signals (2)

Wire headlines retained with this event snapshot — corroboration behind the news component. Each link is the original source.

The W.E.T. Score measures evidence quality — comparable volume, verified agreement, coverage, and corroboration behind a price. Venue-reported contract counts are never treated as dollars. It is not a prediction of the outcome, not a rating of whether the favorite wins, and not trading advice: a Thin Signal market can still resolve YES, and a Prime Signal market can still resolve NO. Full weighting and worked examples in the methodology.

The desk layer

Prediction desk tools

The published reading above is complete. Account-aware tools load after the article settles so identity work cannot compete with the answer.

Checking desk access…

Key takeaways

  • Final market read: Lula da Silva <5% at 50% implied probability on Polymarket.
  • The odds moved from 54% at the start of coverage to 50% at close.
  • This is a settled-market archive — the market’s final pre-close read, not the venue’s official resolution.

This market has settled. The final prediction-market read before close was 50% implied probability for Lula da Silva <5% on Polymarket.

The market's final read

The market never fully made up its mind: Lula da Silva <5% closed at just 50%. The attributed event snapshot reports $1.2M in venue-native volume.

How the odds moved

W.E.T. tracked this market for 10 days: Lula da Silva <5% opened our coverage at 54%, ranged between 50% and 69%, and closed at 50%. Implied probability is the attributed venue listing's price read as a percentage. It repriced as news landed, right up until the market closed.

Why settled odds still matter

A settled market is a permanent record of what traders collectively expected before the outcome was known — the raw material for judging how well prediction markets forecast the real world. This page archives the market's final pre-close read; the official resolved outcome is published by the venue itself. Comparing final reads to outcomes across many markets is how prediction-market accuracy is measured.

Browse the live Elections odds & probability desk for markets still trading, or the Event Dashboard for real-time prices. For how these numbers were sourced and computed, see the methodology.

Frequently asked questions

What were the final odds for Brazil Presidential Election First Round: Margin of?

The market closed with Lula da Silva <5% at 50% implied probability on Polymarket. That was W.E.T.'s final attributed listing observation before the market settled.

Did the prediction market get Brazil Presidential Election First Round: Margin of right?

This page archives the market's final pre-close read — 50% for Lula da Silva <5%. The officially resolved outcome is published by the venue. Comparing final market reads to real outcomes across many events is exactly how prediction-market accuracy is measured, which is why settled archives like this one matter.

Are these odds still live?

No. This market has settled and the figures on this page are frozen as a historical archive. Live markets are on the predictions desk and the Event Dashboard.

Markets & sources

Related topics

From the W.E.T. WirePlatforms

Kalshi vs Polymarket: Which Should You Use?

A market-native comparison of Kalshi and Polymarket: regulation, funding rails, coverage, fees, liquidity, settlement, and which platform fits your trading.

Read on the Wire

Embed this market

Put this dated odds snapshot on your site, newsletter, or blog. The card states its as-of date and attributed venue; it changes only when W.E.T. publishes a newer observation and does not independently stream the venue. Works anywhere you can paste an iframe (Substack, WordPress, Ghost, Webflow), and the attribution links back to the full W.E.T. breakdown. Browse available snapshot cards in the widget gallery.

Preview

Embed code
<iframe src="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/embed/predictions/brazil-presidential-election-first-round-margin-of-victory-odds-2026-10-05" width="480" height="200" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy" title="Brazil Presidential Election First Round: Margin of — prediction market odds by World Event Trading"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Odds via <a href="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/predictions/brazil-presidential-election-first-round-margin-of-victory-odds-2026-10-05?utm_source=wet-embed&utm_medium=attribution&utm_content=brazil-presidential-election-first-round-margin-of-victory-odds-2026-10-05">World Event Trading</a></p>

W.E.T. is an information and data service — not a gambling operator. We take no bets and hold no funds. Nothing here is financial, legal, betting, or tax advice, or a prediction of the outcome, and prediction market trading involves risk of loss. Prediction markets may be restricted or illegal in your jurisdiction — check local law. 18+. See how we source and compute these odds in our methodology, or read the full disclaimer.

Explore retained event intelligence

This page is archival. Use the Event Dashboard to inspect separately dated, venue-attributed listings; numerical comparisons remain identity-gated.

More predictions