Sports Heat — the basket
SlateDailyThe real markets behind this index, across every venue that lists them, tracked as one spread. Instead of reading a single contract, you read the theme — which is what a multi-week position is actually exposed to. Each holding links straight to its venue; W.E.T. never handles orders, you trade at the exchange.
hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage
Basket performance
hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage- Level
- 615.01
- Since inception
- −38.50%
- 1 day
- −38.48%
- 7 day
- —
- Markets held
- 3
- Settled
- 46
- Rebalanced out
- 32
- Hit rate
- 57.9%
- Cash
- 92.1%
- Inception
- 2026-08-01
- Weighting
- Equal notional
- Marks
- Two-sided mid
- Days tracked
- 6
Equal notional from each holding’s inception mark, re-marked at the two-sided mid. Percentages only, size-blind — never a cash figure and never a performance claim.
A published measurement of what these markets did together. Not an account, not directly investable; W.E.T. never handles orders.
Holdings · 3 markets
every holding links to the venue that lists it- Will New England Revolution win on 2026-03-07?polymarket · YES · entry 38cpolymarketYES38c39c+2.5%2.9%Polymarket ↗
- Will Amanda Anisimova win the Tararudee vs Anisimova: Round Of 64 match? — Amanda Anisimovakalshi · YES · entry 50ckalshiYES50c50c0.0%1.6%Kalshi ↗
- Will Jackson Koivun win the 2026 Wyndham Championship?polymarket · YES · entry 5cpolymarketYES5c6c+31.2%0.2%Polymarket ↗
Settled · 46
graded outcomes — the basket's realized recordRebalanced out · 32
closed at the mark when the membership changed — not graded outcomesAll markets resolve YES · 3 of 3
a computed statistic about this watchlist — not an instrument, not offered anywhereThe chance that every one of these markets resolves YES. It is the mathematical opposite of the basket above: the basket is a weighted mean, where one loss doesn't zero it; this is a product, where every market must land. Same markets, opposite risk shape — which is the whole reason to show them together.
The markets shown are this index's most likely holdings, added while the joint probability stays above 1%. Ranking by portfolio weight instead would be arbitrary here, since equal-notional weights are near-identical by design.
Multiplying probabilities assumes the markets are independent — which is precisely wrong for markets grouped by a shared theme, since correlation is why they sit in one index. The range is therefore the honest answer: the true joint probability sits inside it under any correlation structure, with no covariance estimate required.
This is a statistic, not a product. W.E.T. does not offer, quote, accept or route a combined position in these markets, and no venue is quoting one here — the figures are computed by W.E.T. from individual market prices. Each market above trades on its own venue, individually, at the links in the holdings table. Data, not advice.
How to read this
The basket holds equal notional in each market from its inception mark, so every holding counts equally in return terms rather than the biggest contract dominating. The level is that combined position, re-marked daily at the two-sided mid and rebased to 1000. Settled markets convert to cash at their payoff and wait for the next monthly review.
This is a published benchmark, not an account and not a product: the index is not directly investable. Marks are mid quotes before fees, spread and slippage, and no capacity limit is assumed — a real position would differ. W.E.T. is not an exchange and never handles orders. Data, not advice. Full methodology.