WOPEN

W.E.T. Openai Financials Index 6mo

v1StandingExperimentalStanding
No reading published for 2026-11-14

The §2.6 ladder refused this print at rung 2. A refusal is publishable; a carried-forward level is not — so this index shows nothing today rather than yesterday’s number wearing today’s date.

Governed close level
—
no level published
Gauge
—
Divisor
—
what chains this level to the last
Closes
53
latest 2026-11-14
Coverage
0 of 0 admitted markets pricedκ 0.0000 · floor 0.95weights two-sided-depth · cap 15.0%
Withheld by the sentinel

7 input(s) were quarantined by sentinel/v1 before this close and are excluded from the reading above.

What would make this reading wrong
  • The "openai" axis stops appearing in financials titles: the selector then admits fewer than 6 markets and the index prints nothing rather than a level over a roster that no longer states the thesis.
  • Weight coverage falls below the declared floor of 95%, at which point the published state is insufficient_data and no value is printed — never a value carried forward from the last close that had one.
  • A published axis starts framing this board. No axis frames a majority of it today (polarity frames 0 of 14, severity frames 0 of 14, threshold frames 0 of 14), and that measurement is what put this worldview on a side-symmetric lens; a composition whose sides become readable is a different index and belongs to a successor spec rather than to an edit of this one.
How this reading was constructed (6)
  • no constituent was admitted at all — an empty roster is a transport failure, not a finding
  • roster refused [empty-roster]: no canonical event on this tape satisfied the universe: 16530 considered, 0 admitted, rejected as keyword-miss 16357, category-not-admitted 121, horizon-outside-window 52. That is a statement about the BOARD on this date, not about the worldview: the close writes insufficient_data and no value rather than reaching for yesterday's number. Note that 52 event(s) passed every other selector and were removed by this index's own declared 60–200d window — an empty roster for a window nothing on the board resolves inside is the window working, not the close failing.
  • universe: resolved by universe/v1 over 16530 candidate canonical event(s) from the `tape-text` source (${m.title ?? ''} ${m.marketRef}), admitting 0. Rejections by reason: keyword-miss 16357, category-not-admitted 121, horizon-outside-window 52.
  • universe: the declared 60–200d horizon window (axis 8) was APPLIED and removed 52 event(s) that every other selector admitted. A member resolving outside the window this index publishes is not a member of this index's horizon, whatever else it is.
  • universe: 16357 event(s) missed the keyword screen on the `tape-text` source, which carries ${m.title ?? ''} ${m.marketRef} and NOT the venue subtitle, tag or series the nomination pool sees. That count is the UPPER BOUND on what the richer string could have added here; it is published rather than estimated, because the tape cannot supply the text that would settle it.
  • no published document file was found for this spec, so the byte comparison had nothing to compare against and only the recompile legs ran. The whitepaper is compiled per request by /methodology/<slug>, which is a publication lag rather than a ledger fault — but the ABSENCE is published here, because an unsupplied optional parameter is invisible on the row and that invisibility is what let this leg go unrun.
Why there are two levels on this page

The governed close level above is divisor-chained: it tracks how the desk’s reading of this perspective has moved since 2026-08-14, and it survives a roster change because the divisor absorbs it. It is not a basket total return.

The basket total return below is a position book: it holds a fixed set of contracts from its own inception and reports what that book did, marks and settlements included. A roster change starts a new book rather than being absorbed.

They share a base of 1,000 and nothing else. Expect them to differ, and read the one that answers your question — the chained level for “where does this perspective stand”, the book for “what would holding it have done”.

spec 86b5827c407d0390 · methodology 105dd45d60dc0115 · closed by standing/v1 · lifecycle experimental · class standing · no directional statement permitted from this print

No value publishedfor 2026-11-14§2.6 rung 2

no constituent was admitted at all — an empty roster is a transport failure, not a finding

Last published reading: 36.66 on 2026-11-05. It is not carried forward.

14 financials markets carrying the "openai" axis across polymarket, every one resolving inside six months, tracked as one composition.

Basket level · official print17 held · close 2026-11-14
841.03−15.90%since inception · base 1000

hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage

Basket performance

hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage
Basket total return
841.03
Since inception
−15.90%
Cost to cross
—
Holdings marked
82.4% of 17
1 day
+0.37%
7 day
−2.18%
Markets held
17
Settled
1
Rebalanced out
0
Hit rate
—
Cash
59.9%
Inception
2026-08-18
Weighting
Equal notional
Marks
Two-sided mid
Days tracked
55

Equal notional from each holding’s inception mark, re-marked at the two-sided mid. Percentages only, size-blind — never a cash figure and never a performance claim.

Cost to cross is the weighted half-spread at the touch on the newest mark tape: what entering at the quote rather than the midpoint would have cost. It is the price of the FIRST unit and says nothing about the tenth — the resting size beside each holding is published so a reader can judge whether their own size fits. It is not deducted from any return above.

A published measurement of what these markets did together. Not an account, not directly investable; W.E.T. never handles orders.

Holdings · 17 markets

held since 2026-08-18 · the reading above is computed over today's roster, which differs
MarketNowReturn
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (HIGH) $2.5T by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 8c3c−55.3%↗
  • Anthropic vs OpenAI - higher valuation on December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 93c7.0¢ spread · 335/500 within 5¢81c−13.0%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (LOW) $500B by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 7c2c−66.9%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (HIGH) $3.0T by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 6c4c−27.3%↗
  • Will OpenAI not IPO by December 31, 2026?polymarket · YES · entry 78c0.6¢ spread · 18.8k/2322.0k within 5¢97c+24.5%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (LOW) $750B by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 26c6c−75.1%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (HIGH) $5.0T by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 2c2c−18.2%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (LOW) $600B by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 8c4c−52.7%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (HIGH) $2.0T by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 11c3c−70.0%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (HIGH) $4.0T by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 3c3c−8.3%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (LOW) $700B by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 19c4c−80.0%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (HIGH) $1.5T by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 26c22c−17.3%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (HIGH) $1.25T by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 37c12 sessions stale99c+171.2%↗
  • OpenAI vs Meta — higher valuation on December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 17c2 sessions stale8c−52.9%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (HIGH) $1.75T by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 13c3c−76.2%↗
  • Will OpenAI's valuation hit (LOW) $800B by December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 34c6c−83.6%↗
  • Anthropic + OpenAI vs Microsoft - higher valuation on December 31?polymarket · YES · entry 37c2 sessions stale23c−37.8%↗

Full basket ledger — settled outcomes, rebalance history, methodology →

WOPEN · at a glance

What it is
14 financials markets carrying the "openai" axis across polymarket, every one resolving inside six months, tracked as one composition.
High vs low
Higher = the markets are more torn — prices across the composition sit closer to a coin flip. Lower = more decided, in EITHER direction: a basket priced at 5% and one priced at 95% both read low. A reading of market prices, not a W.E.T. forecast.
Who cares
Anyone tracking how openai is being priced across venues on a composition of at least 6 markets resolving inside 200 days.

Embed this score

always the latest published reading, dated · attribution built in

Put the live WOPEN reading on your own site, README, or newsletter.

Badge For articles, profiles & READMEs

WET Index Score badge preview

The index. Ready to share. Actual embed

Markdown badge
[![WOPEN — WET Index Score](https://www.worldeventtrading.com/api/indices/openai-financials-inside-six-months/badge)](https://www.worldeventtrading.com/indices/openai-financials-inside-six-months)
HTML badge
<a href="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/indices/openai-financials-inside-six-months"><img src="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/api/indices/openai-financials-inside-six-months/badge" alt="WOPEN — WET Index Score" /></a>
Iframe card
<iframe src="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/embed/indices/openai-financials-inside-six-months" width="340" height="170" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="WOPEN — WET Index Score" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Quote this index

free to cite with attribution + the as-of date
“The W.E.T. Openai Financials Index 6mo (WOPEN) publishes a daily WET Index Score on a 0–100 scale, per World Event Trading.”

Full methodology →JSONLive intradayDaily report

Maintained by Corbin V King. A benchmark reading of market prices — data, not advice. See the disclaimer.