W.E.T. Inverse Los Angeles Football Index 6mo
v1StandingExperimentalStandinglos-angeles-football-inside-six-months reads 35.12 against this index’s 64.88. Same markets, opposite side.
46 input(s) were quarantined by sentinel/v1 before this close and are excluded from the reading above.
- The board stops listing markets that name Los Angeles's football clubs inside this window: the selector then admits fewer than 6 markets and the index prints nothing rather than a level over a roster that no longer states the thesis.
- Weight coverage falls below the declared floor of 95%, at which point the published state is insufficient_data and no value is printed — never a value carried forward from the last close that had one.
- A Los Angeles club in another sport starts sharing this one's published vocabulary, at which point the declared exclusions stop separating the two and the composition would silently become an all-sports index for this metro wearing a single-sport name.
How this reading was constructed (9)
- universe: resolved by universe/v1 over 13681 candidate canonical event(s) from the `tape-text` source (
${m.title ?? ''}${m.marketRef}), admitting 73. Rejections by reason: excluded-keyword 874, keyword-miss 12535, category-not-admitted 4, horizon-outside-window 195. - universe: the declared 60–200d horizon window (axis 8) was APPLIED and removed 195 event(s) that every other selector admitted. A member resolving outside the window this index publishes is not a member of this index's horizon, whatever else it is.
- universe: 12535 event(s) missed the keyword screen on the `tape-text` source, which carries
${m.title ?? ''}${m.marketRef}and NOT the venue subtitle, tag or series the nomination pool sees. That count is the UPPER BOUND on what the richer string could have added here; it is published rather than estimated, because the tape cannot supply the text that would settle it. - 874 canonical event(s) matched an excludeKeywords term and were not admitted. An exclusion is an ADMISSION decision and never a side one (§3.1): nothing here flips a member, it only declines to hold it.
- eligibility: 58 of 73 admitted event(s) left the roster on the spec's own declared eligibility (minVolume 250, maxSpread 0.1, price 0.02-0.98) — by reason: below-min-volume 54, spread-too-wide 4. An ineligible market is out of the universe; a member the close could not price stays in it and is counted against κ.
- orientation: the declared `threshold` framing axis (§3.3) was re-read on this tape and took NO force [undetermined:coverage], framing 0 of 15 members and holding 0 of them NO. The declared threshold axis frames 0 of 15 members (0%), under the published 50% bar, so it takes no force today and no member is flipped by it. An axis that frames a corner of the board would state a direction for members it never read. This is the spec's own invalidation condition, measured rather than assumed. The axis is re-read at every close rather than frozen into a declared side table, so a roster whose contracts resolve and are replaced is oriented by the rule this spec published rather than by one evening's reading of it (cultivation-orientation/v3).
- orientation: because the declared `threshold` axis took no force today, every member not named in `sideRules.declaredSides` and not matched by a keyword list is held on the venue's own YES framing. That reads the board's LISTING CONVENTION rather than this index's thesis, and it is the state the spec's own invalidation conditions name — published here rather than left to look like a decision the axis made.
- no published document file was found for this spec, so the byte comparison had nothing to compare against and only the recompile legs ran. The whitepaper is compiled per request by /methodology/<slug>, which is a publication lag rather than a ledger fault — but the ABSENCE is published here, because an unsupplied optional parameter is invisible on the row and that invisibility is what let this leg go unrun.
- the level was chained as a price relative over the PRIOR composition at today's prices: 14 prior member(s), of which 0 could not be priced today and left through the DIVISOR (0 at a venue-reported resolution, 0 at their last governed mark, 0 unpriced on both dates). Price relative 1.000701535 against a gauge basis of 0.648829528; the divisor moved to absorb the composition and weight change, so what the level published is the price move and nothing else.
The governed close level above is divisor-chained: it tracks how the desk’s reading of this perspective has moved since 2026-08-14, and it survives a roster change because the divisor absorbs it. It is not a basket total return.
The basket total return below is a position book: it holds a fixed set of contracts from its own inception and reports what that book did, marks and settlements included. A roster change starts a new book rather than being absorbed.
They share a base of 1,000 and nothing else. Expect them to differ, and read the one that answers your question — the chained level for “where does this perspective stand”, the book for “what would holding it have done”.
spec 286ae9bd47624b83 · methodology 8b607bfabc122d5c · closed by standing/v1 · lifecycle experimental · class standing
As of Sep 8, 2026 · last moved Sep 8, 2026 · scale 0–100 (Low support → High support)
The same markets naming Los Angeles Chargers and Los Angeles Rams, read on the down case of the threshold axis rather than the up case.
hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage
Basket performance
hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage- Basket total return
- 1010.76
- Since inception
- +1.08%
- Cost to cross
- —
- Holdings marked
- 64.7% of 17
- 1 day
- +0.14%
- 7 day
- +1.01%
- Markets held
- 17
- Settled
- 0
- Rebalanced out
- 0
- Hit rate
- —
- Cash
- 49.5%
- Inception
- 2026-08-18
- Weighting
- Equal notional
- Marks
- Two-sided mid
- Days tracked
- 18
Equal notional from each holding’s inception mark, re-marked at the two-sided mid. Percentages only, size-blind — never a cash figure and never a performance claim.
Cost to cross is the weighted half-spread at the touch on the newest mark tape: what entering at the quote rather than the midpoint would have cost. It is the price of the FIRST unit and says nothing about the tenth — the resting size beside each holding is published so a reader can judge whether their own size fits. It is not deducted from any return above.
A published measurement of what these markets did together. Not an account, not directly investable; W.E.T. never handles orders.
Holdings · 17 markets
held since 2026-08-18 · the reading above is computed over today's roster, which differs- Will Los Angeles Rams win the 2027 NFL NFC Championship?polymarket · NO · entry 77c1.0¢ spread · 66.1k/10.3k within 5¢polymarketNO77c76c−1.3%15.0%Polymarket ↗
- Will Los Angeles Chargers win the 2026 AFC West?polymarket · NO · entry 65cpolymarketNO65c70c+8.5%15.0%Polymarket ↗
- Will Los Angeles Rams win the 2026 NFC West?polymarket · NO · entry 52c2.0¢ spread · 4.1k/4.0k within 5¢polymarketNO52c51c−1.0%15.0%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Los Angeles Chargers make the 2027 NFL Playoffs?polymarket · NO · entry 36cpolymarketNO36c39c+8.5%12.8%Polymarket ↗
- Will Los Angeles Chargers win the 2027 NFL AFC Championship?polymarket · NO · entry 90cpolymarketNO90c91c+1.1%9.4%Polymarket ↗
- Will the season series between the Rams and Seahawks end in a tie during the 2026-27 NFL regular season?polymarket · NO · entry 54cpolymarketNO54c54c0.0%8.8%Polymarket ↗
- NFC Championship Winner — Los Angeles Rgemini · NO · entry 77c2 sessions stalegeminiNO77c76c−1.3%5.9%Gemini Predictions ↗
- 2027 Pro Football Champion — Los Angeles Rgemini · NO · entry 86c2 sessions stalegeminiNO86c84c−2.3%5.0%Gemini Predictions ↗
- 2027 Pro Football Champion — Los Angeles Cgemini · NO · entry 96c2 sessions stalegeminiNO96c95c−1.0%3.2%Gemini Predictions ↗
- National League Champion — Los Angeles Dgemini · NO · entry 55c7 sessions stalegeminiNO55c60c+9.1%2.6%Gemini Predictions ↗
- AFC Championship Winner — Los Angeles Cgemini · NO · entry 90c2 sessions stalegeminiNO90c90c0.0%2.2%Gemini Predictions ↗
- Will the season series between the Chiefs and Chargers end in a tie during the 2026-27 NFL regular season?polymarket · NO · entry 49cpolymarketNO49c51c+4.1%2.2%Polymarket ↗
- Will the season series between the Raiders and Chargers end in a tie during the 2026-27 NFL regular season?polymarket · NO · entry 55c12 sessions stalepolymarketNO55c57c+4.6%0.8%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Rams win the season series against the Cardinals during the 2026-27 NFL regular season?polymarket · NO · entry 27cpolymarketNO27c21c−20.8%0.7%Polymarket ↗
- Will the season series between the Cardinals and Rams end in a tie during the 2026-27 NFL regular season?polymarket · NO · entry 79cpolymarketNO79c83c+5.1%0.6%Polymarket ↗
- Will the 49ers win the season series against the Rams during the 2026-27 NFL regular season?polymarket · NO · entry 86cpolymarketNO86c88c+1.7%0.4%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Cardinals win the season series against the Rams during the 2026-27 NFL regular season?polymarket · NO · entry 96cpolymarketNO96c96c−0.0%0.4%Polymarket ↗
Full basket ledger — settled outcomes, rebalance history, methodology →
The opposing claim
the same roster, read the other way — one close, two seriesThis index is one side of a pair. The same canonical roster, consolidated once, is read against the opposite case and published as its own governed series — so the counter-argument is a number on the board, not a caveat in the prose.
Read the opposite side →Holding both sides of this argument should cost nothing — the outcomes are exhaustive. It does not. The two levels sum to 1999.54 against a combined base of 2,000, and that gap is path, spread and friction rather than a view about the world. Gauges complement exactly; levels do not, because a level remembers the route it took.
Friction gauge Φ 1.87 · complement residual 0 — the gauge identity is checked at every close and published whether or not it holds.
Key statistics
- Previous
- 62.17
- Band
- Elevated
- 13d Range
- 6271
- Percentile
- 39th
- 9d Change
- +0.5
- Volatility
- 2.2 pts/d
- Streak
- —
- Markets
- 15
- Effective N
- 8.2
- Top Weight
- 15%
- Venues
- 15 P
- Method
- v1
Indicative tape · 7 sessions
124 hourly readings since 2026-09-03 · not the governed closeINDICATIVEHourly readings that reprice the roster and frozen weights of the last governed close — only prices moved. Each one was computed and recorded at the timestamp it carries; nothing here is reconstructed from venue history. They carry no sentinel screen, enter no ledger and join no checksum chain, and a refused hour breaks the line rather than being drawn through. The daily WET Close is the official value.
Daily close
13d published · interactive13 published close(s) — 0–100 (Low support → High support). Drag to pan, scroll to zoom. One slot per published close, not one per day: dates on the axis are real, the spacing between them is not. 13 day(s) inside this window published no close and are not drawn at all. For the calendar-true spacing, read the chart below. Drawn as a line, not candles: a daily close carries no open, high or low, and a candle would assert an intraday range nobody observed.
History & 14-day projection
solid = 13d published · dashed = projected · shaded = 80% bandModel extrapolation of the published series (robust trend, 13 readings, slope -0.13/day, projection σ 3.1 pts/d widened for a 13-reading sample) — a benchmark projection, not a W.E.T. forecast.
Desk read
W.E.T. analysis — PremiumPremium
The desk's read on today's move
Why the index moved, in the desk's words — not just the arithmetic.
What moved today
attribution — PremiumPremium
Which markets moved the index, and by how much
Signed contribution per constituent, ranked.
Contribution by category
weight share of today's valueConstituents by weight
all 15 · what today's reading was computed over (2026-09-08) · the basket below holds a different setWLOS2 · at a glance
- What it is
- The same markets naming Los Angeles Chargers and Los Angeles Rams, read on the down case of the threshold axis rather than the up case.
- High vs low
- Higher = the composition is pricing more support for this thesis. Lower = less. A reading of market prices, not a W.E.T. forecast.
- Who cares
- Anyone tracking how los-angeles-football is being priced across venues on a composition of at least 6 markets resolving inside 200 days.
Embed this score
always the latest published reading, dated · attribution built inPut the live WLOS2 reading on your own site, README, or newsletter.
Badge · works anywhere images do
Card · iframe for articles & dashboards
[](https://www.worldeventtrading.com/indices/los-angeles-football-inside-six-months-inverse)<a href="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/indices/los-angeles-football-inside-six-months-inverse"><img src="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/api/indices/los-angeles-football-inside-six-months-inverse/badge" alt="WLOS2 — WET Index Score" /></a><iframe src="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/embed/indices/los-angeles-football-inside-six-months-inverse" width="340" height="170" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="WLOS2 — WET Index Score" loading="lazy"></iframe>Quote this index
free to cite with attribution + the as-of date“As of Sep 8, 2026, the W.E.T. Inverse Los Angeles Football Index 6mo (WLOS2) prints a WET Index Score of 64.9/100 (Elevated), per World Event Trading.”
Maintained by Corbin V King. A benchmark reading of market prices — data, not advice. See the disclaimer.