WINTE

W.E.T. Interest Economics Index 6mo

v1StandingExperimentalStanding
Governed close level
—
no level published
Gauge
75.76
0–100 · rung 6
Divisor
—
what chains this level to the last
Closes
53
latest 2026-11-14
Coverage
21 of 21 admitted markets pricedκ 1.0000 · floor 0.95weights two-sided-depth · cap 15.0%
Withheld by the sentinel

7 input(s) were quarantined by sentinel/v1 before this close and are excluded from the reading above.

What would make this reading wrong
  • The "interest" axis stops appearing in economics titles: the selector then admits fewer than 6 markets and the index prints nothing rather than a level over a roster that no longer states the thesis.
  • Weight coverage falls below the declared floor of 95%, at which point the published state is insufficient_data and no value is printed — never a value carried forward from the last close that had one.
  • A published axis starts framing this board. No axis frames a majority of it today (polarity frames 0 of 9, severity frames 0 of 9, threshold frames 2 of 9), and that measurement is what put this worldview on a side-symmetric lens; a composition whose sides become readable is a different index and belongs to a successor spec rather than to an edit of this one.
How this reading was constructed (7)
  • universe: resolved by universe/v1 over 16530 candidate canonical event(s) from the `tape-text` source (${m.title ?? ''} ${m.marketRef}), admitting 30. Rejections by reason: keyword-miss 16443, category-not-admitted 7, horizon-outside-window 50.
  • universe: the declared 60–200d horizon window (axis 8) was APPLIED and removed 50 event(s) that every other selector admitted. A member resolving outside the window this index publishes is not a member of this index's horizon, whatever else it is.
  • universe: 16443 event(s) missed the keyword screen on the `tape-text` source, which carries ${m.title ?? ''} ${m.marketRef} and NOT the venue subtitle, tag or series the nomination pool sees. That count is the UPPER BOUND on what the richer string could have added here; it is published rather than estimated, because the tape cannot supply the text that would settle it.
  • eligibility: 9 of 30 admitted event(s) left the roster on the spec's own declared eligibility (minVolume 250, maxSpread 0.1, price 0.02-0.98) — by reason: price-below-floor 7, spread-too-wide 2. An ineligible market is out of the universe; a member the close could not price stays in it and is counted against κ.
  • orientation: the declared `threshold` framing axis (§3.3) was re-read on this tape and took NO force [undetermined:split], framing 15 of 21 members and holding 0 of them NO. The 15 members the threshold axis frames split 8/7 between `up` and `down` — a 53% majority against a 67% bar is two directions, not one, so no member is flipped on it today. The axis is re-read at every close rather than frozen into a declared side table, so a roster whose contracts resolve and are replaced is oriented by the rule this spec published rather than by one evening's reading of it (cultivation-orientation/v3).
  • orientation: because the declared `threshold` axis took no force today, every member not named in `sideRules.declaredSides` and not matched by a keyword list is held on the venue's own YES framing. That reads the board's LISTING CONVENTION rather than this index's thesis, and it is the state the spec's own invalidation conditions name — published here rather than left to look like a decision the axis made.
  • no published document file was found for this spec, so the byte comparison had nothing to compare against and only the recompile legs ran. The whitepaper is compiled per request by /methodology/<slug>, which is a publication lag rather than a ledger fault — but the ABSENCE is published here, because an unsupplied optional parameter is invisible on the row and that invisibility is what let this leg go unrun.
Why there are two levels on this page

The governed close level above is divisor-chained: it tracks how the desk’s reading of this perspective has moved since 2026-08-14, and it survives a roster change because the divisor absorbs it. It is not a basket total return.

The basket total return below is a position book: it holds a fixed set of contracts from its own inception and reports what that book did, marks and settlements included. A roster change starts a new book rather than being absorbed.

They share a base of 1,000 and nothing else. Expect them to differ, and read the one that answers your question — the chained level for “where does this perspective stand”, the book for “what would holding it have done”.

spec c9685983bb99bb53 · methodology 182f2b7e99b6d4d8 · closed by standing/v1 · lifecycle experimental · class standing

75.76+3.90 (+5.43%)Elevated & cooling, volatile

As of Nov 14, 2026 · last moved Nov 14, 2026 · scale 0–100 (Low support → High support)

21 economics markets carrying the "interest" axis across polymarket, every one resolving inside six months, tracked as one composition.

Basket level · official print24 held · close 2026-11-14
1047.48+4.75%since inception · base 1000

hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage

Basket performance

hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage
Basket total return
1047.48
Since inception
+4.75%
Cost to cross
—
Holdings marked
33.3% of 24
1 day
−0.29%
7 day
+4.60%
Markets held
24
Settled
2
Rebalanced out
0
Hit rate
—
Cash
57.8%
Inception
2026-08-18
Weighting
Equal notional
Marks
Two-sided mid
Days tracked
55

Equal notional from each holding’s inception mark, re-marked at the two-sided mid. Percentages only, size-blind — never a cash figure and never a performance claim.

Cost to cross is the weighted half-spread at the touch on the newest mark tape: what entering at the quote rather than the midpoint would have cost. It is the price of the FIRST unit and says nothing about the tenth — the resting size beside each holding is published so a reader can judge whether their own size fits. It is not deducted from any return above.

A published measurement of what these markets did together. Not an account, not directly investable; W.E.T. never handles orders.

Holdings · 24 markets

held since 2026-08-18 · the reading above is computed over today's roster, which differs
MarketNowReturn
  • Will the Fed increase interest rates by 25 bps after the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 24c15 sessions stale17c−29.8%↗
  • Will there be no change in Fed interest rates after the December 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 68c4c−94.2%↗
  • Will the Fed increase interest rates by 25 bps after the December 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 25c1.0¢ spread · 279.2k/2329.4k within 5¢88c+257.1%↗
  • Will there be no change in Fed interest rates after the January 2027 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 62c1.0¢ spread · 144.5k/60.4k within 5¢42c−32.5%↗
  • Will the Fed decrease interest rates by 25 bps after the December 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 9c1c−88.5%↗
  • Will the Fed increase interest rates by 25 bps after the January 2027 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 20c57c+187.5%↗
  • Bank of Japan increases interest rates by 50+ bps after the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 5c15 sessions stale1c−77.8%↗
  • Will the Fed decrease interest rates by 50+ bps after the January 2027 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 5c1c−81.1%↗
  • Will the Fed increase interest rates by 50+ bps after the January 2027 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 2c1c−43.2%↗
  • Will the Fed decrease interest rates by 25 bps after the January 2027 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 14c1c−93.1%↗
  • Will the Bank of Canada make no change to the target for the overnight rate at the October interest rate announcement?polymarket · YES · entry 91c15 sessions stale70c−23.3%↗
  • Will the Bank of Canada increase the target for the overnight rate by 25 bps at the October interest rate announcement?polymarket · YES · entry 6c15 sessions stale31c+426.7%↗
  • No change in Bank of Japan’s interest rates after the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 74c15 sessions stale88c+19.0%↗
  • Will the Bank of Canada decrease the target for the overnight rate by 25 bps at the October interest rate announcement?polymarket · YES · entry 4c14 sessions stale1c−77.3%↗
  • No change in Bank of England’s interest rates after November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 86c15 sessions stale14c−84.2%↗
  • No change in Bank of Mexico’s interest rates after November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 81c15 sessions stale95c+17.4%↗
  • Bank of Japan increases interest rates by 25 bps after the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 24c15 sessions stale12c−51.1%↗
  • No change in Reserve Bank of Australia's interest rates at the November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 73c15 sessions stale90c+22.6%↗
  • Bank of Mexico increases interest rates by 25 bps after November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 6c15 sessions stale4c−32.2%↗
  • Reserve Bank of New Zealand decreases interest rates by 25 bps at the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 2c14 sessions stale1c−54.2%↗
  • Bank of England increases interest rates by 25 bps after November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 11c15 sessions stale84c+700.0%↗
  • Reserve Bank of New Zealand increases interest rates by 25 bps at the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 43c15 sessions stale68c+58.8%↗
  • No change in Reserve Bank of New Zealand's interest rates at the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 56c15 sessions stale30c−47.3%↗
  • Reserve Bank of New Zealand decreases interest rates by 50+ bps at the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 2c15 sessions stale1c−52.4%↗

Full basket ledger — settled outcomes, rebalance history, methodology →

Key statistics

Previous
71.86
Band
Elevated
49d Range
6184
Percentile
86th
9d Change
+0.1
Volatility
5.5 pts/d
Streak
—
Markets
21
Effective N
9.1
Top Weight
15%
Venues
21 P
Method
v1

Indicative tape · 7 sessions

97 hourly readings since 2026-10-22 · not the governed close
55.060.065.070.075.080.010-22 00:0011-03 03:0011-15 05:00
Latest
75.48
Since 2026-10-22
+19.62
Range
55.4–80.1
Readings
97

INDICATIVEHourly readings that reprice the roster and frozen weights of the last governed close — only prices moved. Each one was computed and recorded at the timestamp it carries; nothing here is reconstructed from venue history. They carry no sentinel screen, enter no ledger and join no checksum chain, and a refused hour breaks the line rather than being drawn through. The daily WET Close is the official value.

Daily close

49d published · interactive

49 published close(s) — 0–100 (Low support → High support). Drag to pan, scroll to zoom. One slot per published close, not one per day: dates on the axis are real, the spacing between them is not. 44 day(s) inside this window published no close and are not drawn at all. For the calendar-true spacing, read the chart below. Drawn as a line, not candles: a daily close carries no open, high or low, and a candle would assert an intraday range nobody observed.

History & 14-day projection

solid = 49d published · dashed = projected · shaded = 80% band
405060708090100now76
Projected 14d
76.20
Change
+0.40
80% band
45–100
Confidence
low

Model extrapolation of the published series (robust trend, 45 readings, slope +0.06/day, projection σ 6.4 pts/d widened for a 45-reading sample) — a benchmark projection, not a W.E.T. forecast.

Desk read

W.E.T. analysis — Insiders
🔒

Insiders

The desk's read on today's move

Why the index moved, in the desk's words — not just the arithmetic.

Checking access…

What moved today

attribution — Insiders
🔒

Insiders

Which markets moved the index, and by how much

Signed contribution per constituent, ranked.

Checking access…

Contribution by category

weight share of today's value
economics100% · 21

Constituents by weight

all 21 · what today's reading was computed over (2026-11-14) · the basket below holds a different set
Show the remaining 1 holdings

Where these markets are covered

1 of 21 constituents has a W.E.T. page

The odds pages covering the individual contracts this index reads. They are the evidence underneath the reading, not readings themselves.

WINTE · at a glance

What it is
21 economics markets carrying the "interest" axis across polymarket, every one resolving inside six months, tracked as one composition.
High vs low
Higher = the markets are more torn — prices across the composition sit closer to a coin flip. Lower = more decided, in EITHER direction: a basket priced at 5% and one priced at 95% both read low. A reading of market prices, not a W.E.T. forecast.
Who cares
Anyone tracking how interest is being priced across venues on a composition of at least 6 markets resolving inside 200 days.

Embed this score

always the latest published reading, dated · attribution built in

Put the live WINTE reading on your own site, README, or newsletter.

Badge For articles, profiles & READMEs

WET Index Score badge preview

The index. Ready to share. Actual embed

Markdown badge
[![WINTE — WET Index Score](https://www.worldeventtrading.com/api/indices/interest-economics-inside-six-months/badge)](https://www.worldeventtrading.com/indices/interest-economics-inside-six-months)
HTML badge
<a href="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/indices/interest-economics-inside-six-months"><img src="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/api/indices/interest-economics-inside-six-months/badge" alt="WINTE — WET Index Score" /></a>
Iframe card
<iframe src="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/embed/indices/interest-economics-inside-six-months" width="340" height="170" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="WINTE — WET Index Score" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Quote this index

free to cite with attribution + the as-of date
“As of Nov 14, 2026, the W.E.T. Interest Economics Index 6mo (WINTE) prints a WET Index Score of 75.8/100 (Elevated), per World Event Trading.”

Full methodology →JSONLive intradayDaily report

Maintained by Corbin V King. A benchmark reading of market prices — data, not advice. See the disclaimer.