Readings may not describe today5 scheduled closes did not landWhy →Hide
5 scheduled closes did not land — the daily index publish was due at 10:37 UTC on 2026-09-23 and the newest print on file is still 2026-09-22. The reading below is carried forward from that date and does not describe today.
Readings below are the last that settled; none has been carried forward, restated or interpolated to cover the gap. Every row states its own date and wears its own age. How the desk publishes
W.E.T. Bank Economics Index 6mo
v1StandingExperimentalStanding32 input(s) were quarantined by sentinel/v1 before this close and are excluded from the reading above.
- The "bank" axis stops appearing in economics titles: the selector then admits fewer than 6 markets and the index prints nothing rather than a level over a roster that no longer states the thesis.
- Weight coverage falls below the declared floor of 95%, at which point the published state is insufficient_data and no value is printed — never a value carried forward from the last close that had one.
- A published axis starts framing this board. No axis frames a majority of it today (polarity frames 0 of 14, severity frames 0 of 14, threshold frames 2 of 14), and that measurement is what put this worldview on a side-symmetric lens; a composition whose sides become readable is a different index and belongs to a successor spec rather than to an edit of this one.
How this reading was constructed (7)
- universe: resolved by universe/v1 over 9403 candidate canonical event(s) from the `tape-text` source (
${m.title ?? ''}${m.marketRef}), admitting 33. Rejections by reason: keyword-miss 9295, category-not-admitted 15, horizon-outside-window 60. - universe: the declared 60–200d horizon window (axis 8) was APPLIED and removed 60 event(s) that every other selector admitted. A member resolving outside the window this index publishes is not a member of this index's horizon, whatever else it is.
- universe: 9295 event(s) missed the keyword screen on the `tape-text` source, which carries
${m.title ?? ''}${m.marketRef}and NOT the venue subtitle, tag or series the nomination pool sees. That count is the UPPER BOUND on what the richer string could have added here; it is published rather than estimated, because the tape cannot supply the text that would settle it. - eligibility: 16 of 33 admitted event(s) left the roster on the spec's own declared eligibility (minVolume 250, maxSpread 0.1, price 0.02-0.98) — by reason: price-below-floor 9, below-min-volume 5, spread-too-wide 2. An ineligible market is out of the universe; a member the close could not price stays in it and is counted against κ.
- orientation: the declared `threshold` framing axis (§3.3) was re-read on this tape and took NO force [undetermined:split], framing 10 of 17 members and holding 0 of them NO. The 10 members the threshold axis frames split 6/4 between `up` and `down` — a 60% majority against a 67% bar is two directions, not one, so no member is flipped on it today. The axis is re-read at every close rather than frozen into a declared side table, so a roster whose contracts resolve and are replaced is oriented by the rule this spec published rather than by one evening's reading of it (cultivation-orientation/v3).
- orientation: because the declared `threshold` axis took no force today, every member not named in `sideRules.declaredSides` and not matched by a keyword list is held on the venue's own YES framing. That reads the board's LISTING CONVENTION rather than this index's thesis, and it is the state the spec's own invalidation conditions name — published here rather than left to look like a decision the axis made.
- no published document file was found for this spec, so the byte comparison had nothing to compare against and only the recompile legs ran. The whitepaper is compiled per request by /methodology/<slug>, which is a publication lag rather than a ledger fault — but the ABSENCE is published here, because an unsupplied optional parameter is invisible on the row and that invisibility is what let this leg go unrun.
The governed close level above is divisor-chained: it tracks how the desk’s reading of this perspective has moved since 2026-08-14, and it survives a roster change because the divisor absorbs it. It is not a basket total return.
The basket total return below is a position book: it holds a fixed set of contracts from its own inception and reports what that book did, marks and settlements included. A roster change starts a new book rather than being absorbed.
They share a base of 1,000 and nothing else. Expect them to differ, and read the one that answers your question — the chained level for “where does this perspective stand”, the book for “what would holding it have done”.
spec f60ccf6765604421 · methodology 6d48524a80ccedb4 · closed by standing/v1 · lifecycle experimental · class standing
As of Sep 22, 2026 · last moved Sep 22, 2026 · scale 0–100 (Low support → High support)
17 economics markets carrying the "bank" axis across polymarket, every one resolving inside six months, tracked as one composition.
hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage
Basket performance
hypothetical · mid marks · before fees, spread and slippage- Basket total return
- 1306.49
- Since inception
- +30.65%
- Cost to cross
- —
- Holdings marked
- 89.3% of 28
- 1 day
- +2.61%
- 7 day
- +10.89%
- Markets held
- 28
- Settled
- 0
- Rebalanced out
- 0
- Hit rate
- —
- Cash
- 38.3%
- Inception
- 2026-08-18
- Weighting
- Equal notional
- Marks
- Two-sided mid
- Days tracked
- 33
Equal notional from each holding’s inception mark, re-marked at the two-sided mid. Percentages only, size-blind — never a cash figure and never a performance claim.
Cost to cross is the weighted half-spread at the touch on the newest mark tape: what entering at the quote rather than the midpoint would have cost. It is the price of the FIRST unit and says nothing about the tenth — the resting size beside each holding is published so a reader can judge whether their own size fits. It is not deducted from any return above.
A published measurement of what these markets did together. Not an account, not directly investable; W.E.T. never handles orders.
Holdings · 28 markets
held since 2026-08-18 · the reading above is computed over today's roster, which differs- Bank of Japan increases interest rates by 50+ bps after the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 5cpolymarketYES5c1c−71.1%15.0%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Canada make no change to the target for the overnight rate at the October interest rate announcement?polymarket · YES · entry 91cpolymarketYES91c53c−41.6%12.4%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Canada increase the target for the overnight rate by 25 bps at the October interest rate announcement?polymarket · YES · entry 6cpolymarketYES6c47c+710.3%9.5%Polymarket ↗
- No change in Bank of Japan’s interest rates after the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 74cpolymarketYES74c82c+10.9%7.3%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Canada decrease the target for the overnight rate by 25 bps at the October interest rate announcement?polymarket · YES · entry 4cpolymarketYES4c1c−77.3%6.1%Polymarket ↗
- No change in Bank of England’s interest rates after November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 86cpolymarketYES86c19c−78.4%5.6%Polymarket ↗
- No change in Bank of Mexico’s interest rates after November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 81cpolymarketYES81c70c−13.0%5.3%Polymarket ↗
- Bank of Japan increases interest rates by 25 bps after the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 24cpolymarketYES24c19c−21.3%4.9%Polymarket ↗
- No change in Reserve Bank of Australia's interest rates at the November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 73cpolymarketYES73c72c−2.1%4.8%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Mexico Hike 50bps at the November Bank of Mexico Governing Board meeting?kalshi · YES · entry 4c6 sessions stalekalshiYES4c3c−14.3%4.3%Kalshi ↗
- Bank of Mexico increases interest rates by 25 bps after November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 6cpolymarketYES6c16c+167.8%3.0%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Brazil make no change to the target for the Selic rate at the November meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 66cpolymarketYES66c28c−57.3%2.6%Polymarket ↗
- Bank of England rate hike in 2026?polymarket · YES · entry 28cpolymarketYES28c92c+232.7%2.2%Polymarket ↗
- Reserve Bank of New Zealand decreases interest rates by 25 bps at the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 2cpolymarketYES2c1c−58.3%1.9%Polymarket ↗
- Bank of England increases interest rates by 25 bps after November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 11cpolymarketYES11c81c+671.4%1.9%Polymarket ↗
- Reserve Bank of New Zealand increases interest rates by 25 bps at the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 43cpolymarketYES43c56c+32.9%1.8%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Russia decrease the key rate after the October Meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 40cpolymarketYES40c28c−27.8%1.7%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Brazil decrease the target for the Selic rate by 50+ bps at the November meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 4cpolymarketYES4c2c−44.7%1.7%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Russia make no change to the key rate after the October Meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 53cpolymarketYES53c70c+32.1%1.4%Polymarket ↗
- No change in Reserve Bank of New Zealand's interest rates at the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 56cpolymarketYES56c43c−24.1%1.2%Polymarket ↗
- Reserve Bank of New Zealand decreases interest rates by 50+ bps at the October 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 2cpolymarketYES2c1c−52.4%1.1%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Brazil decrease the target for the Selic rate by 25 bps at the November meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 34cpolymarketYES34c66c+92.6%1.0%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Mexico Cut 25bps at the November Bank of Mexico Governing Board meeting?kalshi · YES · entry 7c6 sessions stalekalshiYES7c6c−14.3%1.0%Kalshi ↗
- Reserve Bank of Australia increases interest rates by 25 bps at the November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 19cpolymarketYES19c28c+52.2%1.0%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Mexico Maintain current rate at the November Bank of Mexico Governing Board meeting?kalshi · YES · entry 82c6 sessions stalekalshiYES82c89c+8.6%0.8%Kalshi ↗
- Major U.S. bank bailout before 2027?polymarket · YES · entry 9cpolymarketYES9c5c−41.2%0.3%Polymarket ↗
- Will the Bank of Russia increase the key rate after the October Meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 7cpolymarketYES7c3c−57.6%0.1%Polymarket ↗
- Reserve Bank of Australia decreases interest rates by 25 bps at the November 2026 meeting?polymarket · YES · entry 2cpolymarketYES2c1c−52.4%0.1%Polymarket ↗
Full basket ledger — settled outcomes, rebalance history, methodology →
Key statistics
- Previous
- —
- Band
- Very high
- 27d Range
- 5286
- Percentile
- 96th
- 8d Change
- +32.7
- Volatility
- 9.3 pts/d
- Streak
- —
- Markets
- 17
- Effective N
- 12.8
- Top Weight
- 14%
- Venues
- 17 P
- Method
- v1
Indicative tape · 6 sessions
133 hourly readings since 2026-09-22 · not the governed closeINDICATIVEHourly readings that reprice the roster and frozen weights of the last governed close — only prices moved. Each one was computed and recorded at the timestamp it carries; nothing here is reconstructed from venue history. They carry no sentinel screen, enter no ledger and join no checksum chain, and a refused hour breaks the line rather than being drawn through. The daily WET Close is the official value.
Daily close
27d published · interactive27 published close(s) — 0–100 (Low support → High support). Drag to pan, scroll to zoom. One slot per published close, not one per day: dates on the axis are real, the spacing between them is not. 13 day(s) inside this window published no close and are not drawn at all. For the calendar-true spacing, read the chart below. Drawn as a line, not candles: a daily close carries no open, high or low, and a candle would assert an intraday range nobody observed.
History & 14-day projection
solid = 27d published · dashed = projected · no band publishedModel extrapolation of the published series (robust trend, 27 readings, slope +0.56/day, projection σ 11.3 pts/d widened for a 27-reading sample) — a benchmark projection, not a W.E.T. forecast.
Desk read
W.E.T. analysis — PremiumPremium
The desk's read on today's move
Why the index moved, in the desk's words — not just the arithmetic.
What moved today
attribution — PremiumPremium
Which markets moved the index, and by how much
Signed contribution per constituent, ranked.
Contribution by category
weight share of today's valueConstituents by weight
all 17 · what today's reading was computed over (2026-09-22) · the basket below holds a different setWBANK · at a glance
- What it is
- 17 economics markets carrying the "bank" axis across polymarket, every one resolving inside six months, tracked as one composition.
- High vs low
- Higher = the markets are more torn — prices across the composition sit closer to a coin flip. Lower = more decided, in EITHER direction: a basket priced at 5% and one priced at 95% both read low. A reading of market prices, not a W.E.T. forecast.
- Who cares
- Anyone tracking how bank is being priced across venues on a composition of at least 6 markets resolving inside 200 days.
Embed this score
always the latest published reading, dated · attribution built inPut the live WBANK reading on your own site, README, or newsletter.
Badge For articles, profiles & READMEs
The index. Ready to share. Actual embed
[](https://www.worldeventtrading.com/indices/bank-economics-inside-six-months)<a href="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/indices/bank-economics-inside-six-months"><img src="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/api/indices/bank-economics-inside-six-months/badge" alt="WBANK — WET Index Score" /></a><iframe src="https://www.worldeventtrading.com/embed/indices/bank-economics-inside-six-months" width="340" height="170" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="WBANK — WET Index Score" loading="lazy"></iframe>Quote this index
free to cite with attribution + the as-of date“As of Sep 22, 2026, the W.E.T. Bank Economics Index 6mo (WBANK) prints a WET Index Score of 85.5/100 (Very high), per World Event Trading.”
Maintained by Corbin V King. A benchmark reading of market prices — data, not advice. See the disclaimer.